Cabrera-Somosa v. Ryan et al
| Jose Abel Cabrera-Somosa |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2014cv01202 |
| June 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Michelle H Burns |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER overruling Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. FURTHER ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court. (Doc. 22 .) FURTHER ORDERED denying th e Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability as leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Petitioner is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 12/18/2014. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) be denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 10/29/14. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
