Ericson et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 30, 2017
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Defendant's Renewed Proposed Limiting Instruction Regarding [Section] 1983 Causation, (Doc. 243 ), is DENIED [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/30/17. (MAW)
|November 3, 2016
ORDER that City Defendants' Motion to Exclude (Doc. 94 ) is DENIED. Defendant Camarillo's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 98 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with the reasoning above. Defendant Camarillo is entitled t o summary judgment on Counts II, III, and IV. Summary judgment for Defendant Camarillo is denied on Count V. City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 106 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Garcia is entitled to summary judgment on Counts II, III, and V. Defendant City of Phoenix is entitled to summary judgment on Counts III and VI. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/2/16.(KGM)
|March 17, 2016
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion in limine to preclude all witnesses and evidence disclosed for the first time in Defendants' Eighth Supplemental Disclosure Statement (served on Plaintiffs one business day before the close of discovery) (Doc. 86 ) is granted. [See attached Order for complete details.] Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/17/2016. (KAL) Modified on 3/18/2016 to WO(SJF).
|December 19, 2014
ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Negligence Claim (Doc. 11 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/19/2014.(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?