Pianka v. De La Rosa et al
||Charles De La Rosa and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
||November 4, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Michelle H Burns (PS)
||David G Campbell
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 16, 2015
ORDER - 1) Petitioner's First Amended Petition (Doc. 8 ) and this case are dismissed. (2) The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (3) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the even t Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for full details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/16/15. (LAD)
|December 17, 2014
ORDER: Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. If Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition on the court-a pproved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner. The Clerk of Court must send Petitioner the current cour t-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Non-Death Penalty)." Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 3 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/17/2014. (ALS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?