Patterson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
| Lorraine Patterson |
| Arizona Department of Economic Security, Thomas C Horne, Maricopa, County of, Mesa, City of, Mesa Police Department, William Montgomery, Frank Milstead, Charles Flanagan, Gregory McKay, Abrienda Hansen, Carla Miller, Patty Nelson-McCall, Lindsey Romero, JoAnne Mathlin, Karen Youngman, Carol Dahle Stiles, Regina Rodriguez and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2015cv00321 |
| February 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 172 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff Lorraine Patterson and that Plaintiff take nothing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk terminate this case. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 4/3/2020. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER granting with prejudice 88 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants Carla Miller, Patty Nelson-McCall, Lindsey Romero, JoAnne Mathlin, and Karen Youngman, dismissing Plaintiff Lorraine Patterson's complaint and this action with prejudice and terminate this case. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 10/11/17.(DXD)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER that Plaintiff's motions for recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) (Docs. 63 , 64 ) are denied. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 11/4/15. (NKS)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that Defendant Maricopa County's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file by 09/02/15, an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. If by that date Plaintiff has not submitted an amended complaint, the Clerk shall terminate this case as against Defendant Maricopa County. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/12/15. (NKS)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER that Defendants' joint Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 30 ) is denied to the extent it seeks dismissal under Rooker-Feldman. Plaintiff shall file a response to the remainder of the Motion no later than 08/04/15. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/21/15. (NKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
