Baker v. Walgreens Company
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 8, 2016
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 44 ), is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 45 ), with respect to Plaintiff's state law claim is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and dismiss this case with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/8/16. (KGM)
|May 6, 2016
ORDER - The Court will exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The Court's Rule 16(b) 15 Scheduling Order, is hereby amended to establish a new deadline of Friday, May 20, 2016, for all dispositive motions to be filed. The Court's Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, is hereby amended to grant the parties leave to file a second motion for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 05/05/2016. (ATD)
|April 18, 2016
ORDER that Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA claims, (Doc. 34 ), is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file briefs as specified above on the issue of whether jurisdiction continues for the Court to hear Plaintiff's state-law claim no later than Monday, May 2, 2016. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/18/2016.(KMG)
|January 12, 2016
ORDER that the motion for protective order (Doc. 31 ) is denied. See order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 1/11/16. (NKS)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?