Molina-Alejos v. Holder

Petitioner: Maria Socorro Molina-Alejos
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2015cv00396
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 1, 2015 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED accepting, adopting and incorporating by reference Magistrate Judge Burns' Report and Recommendation and the analysis contained therein (Doc. 25 ). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/1/15. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Molina-Alejos v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Annette M Wietecha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maria Socorro Molina-Alejos
Represented By: James Eric Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?