Phoenix, City of v. First State Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Phoenix, City of
Defendant: First State Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, New England Reinsurance Corporation and Nutmeg Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2015cv00511
Filed: March 20, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65 ) is granted; the City's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 68 ) is denied; Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Jeffrey Stempel (Doc. 67 ) is granted t o the extent stated in this order; Defendants' Motion to Transfer Related Case (Doc. 78 ) is denied; and that the Clerk enter judgment against Plaintiff City of Phoenix and in favor of Defendants First State Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, New England Reinsurance Corporation, and Nutmeg Insurance Company that Plaintiff take nothing. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/2/16.Associated Cases: 2:15-cv-00511-NVW, 2:16-cv-01083-JAT(KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phoenix, City of v. First State Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First State Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert Anthony Justman
Represented By: Joshua Philip Mayer
Represented By: James P Ruggeri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert Anthony Justman
Represented By: Joshua Philip Mayer
Represented By: James P Ruggeri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New England Reinsurance Corporation
Represented By: Robert Anthony Justman
Represented By: Joshua Philip Mayer
Represented By: James P Ruggeri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nutmeg Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert Anthony Justman
Represented By: Joshua Philip Mayer
Represented By: James P Ruggeri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phoenix, City of
Represented By: Emil John Kotalik, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas Ronald Nadzieja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?