De La Rosa v. Arpaio et al
Plaintiff: |
Rodney Cabrera De La Rosa |
Defendant: |
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Parties and Unknown Party |
Case Number: |
2:2015cv00715 |
Filed: |
April 20, 2015 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Office: |
Phoenix Division Office |
County: |
Maricopa |
Presiding Judge: |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Presiding Judge: |
David G Campbell |
Nature of Suit: |
Prison Condition |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 18, 2015 |
Filing
14
ORDER: Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 12 ) and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the di smissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 09/18/2015. (REK)
|
July 7, 2015 |
Filing
11
ORDER - Plaintiff's May 13, 2015 Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 6 ) is denied. The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 10 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second ame nded complaint in compliance with this Order. The Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 07/06/15. (ATD)
|
May 15, 2015 |
Filing
7
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff's "Motion to Request Reply" (Doc. 5 ) is denied. The Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See document for further details. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/15/2015. (REK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?