Roseberry v. Ryan et al

Petitioner: Homer Ray Roseberry
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Ron Credio
Case Number: 2:2015cv01507
Filed: August 5, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 15, 2016 40 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting Respondent's 33 Motion for Reconsideration. FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Court's 31 order granting Roseberry's motion to file his amended habeas petition under seal. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal Roseberry's 32 amended petition. FURTHER ORDERED denying Roseberry's 35 motion to seal his response to Respondents' motion for reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/15/2016. (ATD)
September 17, 2015 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Respondents' motion for an order precluding Petitioner's legal team from contacting victims (Doc. 8 ) is granted as follows. No person who is defined as a victim in this matter under Arizona law shall be contacted by anyone wo rking on behalf of Petitioner unless the victim has consented to such contact. Petitioner shall advise Respondents if he wishes to contact a victim. Respondents shall then advise the victim, or victims counsel, of Petitioner's request. If a victim does not consent, and Petitioner nonetheless believes contact is necessary, Petitioner may file a motion with the Court explaining the necessity for such contact. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 9/16/15. (NKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?