Nakanwagi v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al

Plaintiff: Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant: Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Russell K Pearce and Arizona, State of
Thirdparty_defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2015cv01596
Filed: August 18, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 16, 2016 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - Plaintiff's 9 First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff elects to file a second amended complaint, the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff elects not to file a second amended complaint wit hin 30 days of the date of this Order, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further order from this Court. Plaintiff's 11 "Suppl[e]ment to Amended Complaint" is stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 5/16/2016. (ATD)
November 16, 2015 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil P rocedure. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by December 16, 2015. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint by December 16, 2015, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further order of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 11/16/15. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nakanwagi v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell K Pearce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?