Ashpole #144294 v. Beresky et al
||James Albert Ashpole
||Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
||November 12, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Bridget S Bade
||Steven P Logan
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 27, 2018
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 56 ) are overruled. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5 ) i s denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/27/18. (EJA)
|April 29, 2016
ORDER ACCEPTING and ADOPTING 18 Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade's Report and Recommendation. This proceeding is stayed and the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5 ) is held in abeyance pending the Arizona Court of Appeals' decision in case number 1 CA-CR 16-0103-PRPC. No later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of this Order, Respondents and Petitioner must inform the Court of the status of his proceedings in state court. See document for details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/29/16. (EJA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?