Gonzalez v. Pena

Petitioner: Jazmin Cortez Gonzalez
Respondent: Israel Acosta Pena
Case Number: 2:2016cv00352
Filed: February 8, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:11601
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 21, 2016 47 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying Petitioner's 44 Motion for New Trial or to Alter or Amend According to Fed.R.Civ.P.59(a) or (e). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/21/2016. (MMO)
July 8, 2016 42 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Gonzalez's Amended Petition for Return of Child, (Doc. 7 ), is DENIED. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/7/2016. (KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jazmin Cortez Gonzalez
Represented By: Maxwell William Mahoney(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Israel Acosta Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?