Geurden et al v. Quantum Transportation LP et al
| Yves Geurden and Claudine Daffe |
| Quantum Transportation LP, Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Vahik Alaverdyan and Unknown Alaverdyan |
| 2:2016cv00642 |
| March 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX Outside US |
| James A Teilborg |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motion to supplement reply to motion for entry of stipulated judgment is GRANTED (Doc. 71 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for entry of stipulated judgment is DENIED (Doc. 66 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the settling parties will advise the Court of whether they are proceeding with the settlement by April 11, 2018 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/28/18. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motion to supplement is granted (Doc. 55 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to intervene for the limited purpose of opposing the stipulated judgment (Doc. 46 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stipulation (Doc. 42 ) is denied without prejudice. The settling parties may, within 14 days, file a motion for entry of a stipulated judgment [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/19/17.(MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
