Rady v. USA

Rady v. USA

Petitioner:	Larry James Rady
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	2:2016cv01294
Filed:	May 2, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Michelle H Burns
Presiding Judge:	Frederick J Martone
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 15, 2017	Filing 9 ORDER: The magistrate judge's recommended disposition (Doc. 6 ) is accepted.Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING Petitioner's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 1 ). It is further ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability under Rule 11, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, for the reason that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/15/2017. (REK)
January 9, 2017	Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Larry James Rady. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV Doc. 1 and CR Doc. 101) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 1/9/17. (KGM)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 15, 2017

Filing 9 ORDER: The magistrate judge's recommended disposition (Doc. 6 ) is accepted.Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING Petitioner's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 1 ). It is further ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability under Rule 11, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, for the reason that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/15/2017. (REK)

January 9, 2017

Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Larry James Rady. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV Doc. 1 and CR Doc. 101) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 1/9/17. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rady v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Gary Michael Restaino(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry James Rady
Represented By:	Keith James Hilzendeger(Designation Public Defender or Community Defender Appointment)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?