Amos v. USA
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 30, 2017
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED sustaining Movant's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Movant Victor Allen Amos's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 1 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED resentencing Movant within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/30/2017. (REK)
|January 23, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV Doc. 1 and CR Doc. 54) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED th at a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appe alable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court's judgment. The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. See document for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 1/23/2017. (REK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?