Hydentra HLP Int. Limited et al v. Sagan Limited et al
| Hydentra HLP Int. Limited and Hydentra LP HLP General Partner Incorporated |
| Sagan Limited, MXN Limited, Netmedia Services Incorporated, David Koonar and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2016cv01494 |
| May 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX Outside US |
| David K Duncan |
| Copyrights |
| 17:101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER denying Defendants' 72 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/26/20. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying 69 Motion for Hearing on Motion. On or before 2/28/2020 the parties shall file a joint memorandum setting forth a proposed discovery and motion schedule for completing this case. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/10/2020.(DGC, nvo)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 35 , 36 , 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/17/17.(DXD)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: Plaintiffs' motion for alternative service (Doc. 12 ) is granted. Defendants' motion to file a sur-reply (Doc. 19 ) is granted. The Clerk shall accept for filing the sur-reply lodged on the Court's docket as Doc. 20 . Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. 21 ) is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/07/2017. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
