Hatch v. USA
| Eddie Lee Hatch |
| USA |
| 2:2016cv02041 |
| June 23, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns |
| John J Tuchi |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in whole 22 Report and Recommendation. Denying and dismissing the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) and Doc. 76 in the related matter 02-CR-1016-PHX-JJT. Denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon a finding that Mr. Hatch has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional right. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/6/17. (DXD)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED adopting in part, as set forth above, the R&R and its reasoning. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Respondent's Motion to Stay (Doc. 6 ) and staying this matter until the Supreme Court of the United States issues its decisio n in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544. If the Supreme Court renders no decision in Beckles during the term, either party may move to lift the stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent's Response/Opposition to Petitioner's 2255 Petition shall be due no later than 14 days after issuance of the decision in Beckles. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/20/2016. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
