Dominguez-Rojas v. USA

Petitioner: Jose Dominguez-Rojas
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2016cv02179
Filed: June 30, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Referring Judge: Bridget S Bade (PS)
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 25, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER sustaining the objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court (Doc. 14 ). Granting Respondent's Motion to Stay Further Proceedings on the Motion to Vacate Sentence (Doc. 9 ). Respondent shall file its answer not later than 30 days after the Supreme Court issues its decision in Dimaya. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/25/17.(DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dominguez-Rojas v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Raynette M Logan(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Dominguez-Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?