Frotten v. INT Technologies LLC et al
| Robert M Frotten |
| INT Technologies LLC and Chris Knott |
| 2:2016cv03289 |
| September 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David K Duncan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
AMENDED ORDER denying INT's 67 motion for summary judgment; and denying Plaintiff's 69 motion for partial summary judgment. INT's 74 motion to strike is denied. The Court will hold a conference call on May 30, 2018 at 4:30 p .m. to set a final pretrial conference and trial date. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate a conference call to include all counsel and the Court. If a dial-in number is to be used, the dial-in information shall be provided to all counsel and the Court no later than May 29, 2018 at 12:00 noon. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/21/2018. (ATD)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER denying 67 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court will hold a conference call on 5/30/2018 at 4:30 PM to set a final pretrial conference and trial date. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiat e a conference call to include all counsel and the Court. If a dial-in number is to be used, the dial-in information shall be provided to all counsel and the Court no later than 5/29/2018 at 12:00 noon. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/21/2018.(DGC, nvo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
