Thompson v. Arpaio

Thompson v. Arpaio

Plaintiff:	Bobby S Thompson
Defendant:	Joseph M Arpaio
Case Number:	2:2016cv03902
Filed:	November 7, 2016
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Mohave
Presiding Judge:	Eileen S Willett (PS)
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 4, 2018	Filing 57 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery" (Doc. 54 ). (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 6/1/18. (SLQ)
December 4, 2017	Filing 33 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 32 re screening 31 Second Amended Complaint - The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended Complaint, this Order, and a copy of the Marshal's Pr ocess Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendants Maricopa County, DO B2230, and DO B2584. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on Defendants within 90 days of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/4/17. (LAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 4, 2018

Filing 57 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery" (Doc. 54 ). (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 6/1/18. (SLQ)

December 4, 2017

Filing 33 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 32 re screening 31 Second Amended Complaint - The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended Complaint, this Order, and a copy of the Marshal's Pr ocess Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendants Maricopa County, DO B2230, and DO B2584. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on Defendants within 90 days of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/4/17. (LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Arpaio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby S Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?