Muktar v. Gurule

Petitioner: Mohammed Muktar
Respondent: Jon Gurule
Case Number: 2:2016cv04028
Filed: November 18, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 2, 2017 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 15 Magistrate Judge Fine's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. The Clerk shall TERMINATE this action and enter judgment. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate of appealability is required. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/2/17. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muktar v. Gurule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mohammed Muktar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jon Gurule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?