Blemaster v. Sabo et al
| Michael Blemaster |
| Horatiu Cornelius Sabo, Rare Cornel Sabo and Unknown Parties |
| Horatiu Cornelius Sabo and Rare Cornel Sabo |
| Michael Blemaster |
| 2:2016cv04557 |
| December 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John W Sedwick |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Court's 133 Order is AFFIRMED, and the Judgment Debtor Examinations set in that Order for August 22, 2018 will proceed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment Debtor Florin Ivan's requests that the Court deny the motion for a judgment debtor examination, as set forth in his 132 response to the motion seeking his testimony in a judgment debtor examination is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court rejects as insufficient Judgment Debtor Florin Ivan's objections to the requests for production included in the Order setting the Judgment Debtor Examinations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 7/16/18. (MSA)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Compel; granting 56 Motion for Extension of Time to File. See PDF document. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/25/17.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 5/17/17.(JWS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
