Adame et al v. Surprise, City of et al
Plaintiff: Maria Adame and Clarisa Abarca
Defendant: Surprise, City of, Surprise Police Department, Joseph Gruver and Shaun McGonigle
Case Number: 2:2017cv03200
Filed: September 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ORDER denying 142 Motion to Bifurcate; striking 144 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and granting 153 Motion to Strike Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/18/21. (DXD)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Remand to State Court 133 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 1/28/2021. (REK)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint 97 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint forthwith. Should Defendants wish to conduct additional discovery as to the decedent's estate, they may file a motion with the C ourt and request additional discovery within fourteen days of the date the amended complaint is filed. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 87 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Summary Judgment is granted as to Plaintiffs' Fourteenth Amendment and negligent use of excessive force claims. Summary Judgment is denied as to all other claims. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/24/2019. (REK)
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 58 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/20/18. (EJA)
June 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER denying 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as moot. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31 ) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Count One of the FAC REMAINS as to Defendant Gruver and Defendant City of Surprise. Count Two of the FAC REMAINS as to Defendant City of Surprise. Count Three of the FAC REMAINS as to Defendant City of Surprise. Count Four of the FAC is DISMISSED as to Defendant Gruver and REMAINS as to Defendant City of Surprise. Coun t Five of the FAC REMAINS as to Defendant Gruver and Defendant City of Surprise. Defendant Surprise Police Department is dismissed as a party. Punitive damages are available for Count One and Count Five of the FAC against Defendant Gruver and are not available for any other claim against any other party. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/29/18. (EJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adame et al v. Surprise, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Adame
Represented By: Anthony Jason Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarisa Abarca
Represented By: Anthony Jason Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Surprise, City of
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Surprise Police Department
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Gruver
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shaun McGonigle
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?