Hall v. Ryan et al
Dowan Hall |
Charles L Ryan and Bill Montgomery |
2:2017cv04118 |
November 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
John J Tuchi |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS ORDERED overruling Petitioner's 23 Objections and adopting in full the 12 R&R in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying and dismissing with prejudice the 1 Petition for Writ of Ha beas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability or leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court finds the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar, and that jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this matter. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/18/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING in full 12 Report and Recommendation in this matter. ORDERED denying and dismissing with prejudice the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1 .) ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability or leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this matter. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/11/19. (EJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.