Hambrick #108663 v. Unknown Party et al
| James Louis Hambrick, Jr. |
| Unknown Party, Charles L Ryan and Vanessa Headstream |
| 2:2018cv00461 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 60 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 60 is granted. This action is terminated with prejudice and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 3/16/2020. (REK)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying Plaintiff's "Request for an [sic] Motion Examination by an Outside Doctor" 39 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff's "Request for an [sic] Motion Enlargement of Time" 38 as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the discovery deadline to June 24, 2019. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to July 24, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting May 24, 2019 as the deadline for the parties to move the Court for a discovery conference pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order (Doc. 13 at 3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 4/24/2019. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
