Cook v. Mountain America Federal Credit Union et al
Tyler Cook |
Mountain America Federal Credit Union, Experian Information Solutions Incorporated, Equifax Information Services LLC and TransUnion LLC |
2:2018cv01548 |
May 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
H Russel Holland |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER denying plaintiff's 98 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and defendant's 99 Motion for Summary Judgment. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 8/29/19. (MSA) |
Filing 54 ORDER: Plaintiff's 44 Motion to Strike is granted, with leave to Mountain America to file an amended answer with respect to paragraphs 18 and 20 of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's 44 Motion to Strike is granted as to Mountain America's first, fourth, and sixth affirmative defenses, with leave to amend Mountain America's fourth affirmative defense. For the reasons stated, leave to amend is denied as to Mountain America's first and sixth affirmative defenses. Mountain America's amended answer shall be served and filed on or before October 4, 2018. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 9/20/18. (GMP) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting Mountain America's 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and granting 24 Motion to Amend/Correct Plaintiff shall serve and file his proposed amended complaint. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 08/03/2018. (KAS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.