Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994 et al v. Teel et al
Plaintiff: Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust II dated February 1, 1999, Taipan Financing Corporation and Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust III dated January 10, 2000
Defendant: Paul Teel and MT Industries Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018cv02084
Filed: July 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine
Nature of Suit: Contract: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to MT Industries Corporation, Paul Teel. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
July 3, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB)
July 3, 2018 Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15685480. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-2084-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (SIB)
July 3, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust II dated February 1, 1999, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust III dated January 10, 2000, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994. (Swann, Michelle) (SIB)
July 3, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust II dated February 1, 1999, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust III dated January 10, 2000, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994, Taipan Financing Corporation. (Swann, Michelle) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB)
July 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15685480 filed by Taipan Financing Corporation, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust III dated January 10, 2000, Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust II dated February 1, 1999. (Swann, Michelle) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994 et al v. Teel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust dated March 4, 1994
Represented By: Michelle Lynn Swann
Represented By: Carolyn R Tatkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust II dated February 1, 1999
Represented By: Michelle Lynn Swann
Represented By: Carolyn R Tatkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taipan Financing Corporation
Represented By: Michelle Lynn Swann
Represented By: Carolyn R Tatkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert G. Hoag Charitable Remainder Unitrust III dated January 10, 2000
Represented By: Michelle Lynn Swann
Represented By: Carolyn R Tatkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Teel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MT Industries Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?