Cisneros v. Midland Credit Management Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Neftali Oliva Cisneros
Defendant: Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2018cv02209
Filed: July 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Midland Credit Management Incorporated, Midland Funding LLC.(Hanus, David)
August 23, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by David J Hanus on behalf of Midland Credit Management Incorporated. (Hanus, David)
August 20, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Neftali Oliva Cisneros. Party Midland Funding LLC terminated. (McDevitt, David)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER - Defendants Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC time to respond to the complaint is extended to 9/7/2018. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/16/2018. (MMO) *Modified text on 8/20/2018 (DXD).
August 14, 2018 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midland Credit Management Incorporated, Midland Funding LLC. (Dunn, Bradley)
August 14, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Midland Credit Management Incorporated, Midland Funding LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dunn, Bradley)
August 3, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David Neal McDevitt on behalf of Neftali Oliva Cisneros. (McDevitt, David)
July 30, 2018 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Neftali Oliva Cisneros: Proof of Service re: Complaint and all filed documents upon Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC on 07/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed (Midland Funding))(Thompson, Russell)
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/13/2018. (MMO)
July 13, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB)
July 13, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management Incorporated, Midland Funding LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
July 13, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15724869. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-2209-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB)
July 13, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Neftali Oliva Cisneros. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB)
July 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15724869 filed by Neftali Oliva Cisneros. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cisneros v. Midland Credit Management Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Funding LLC
Represented By: David J Hanus
Represented By: Bradley Lynn Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management Incorporated
Represented By: David J Hanus
Represented By: Bradley Lynn Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neftali Oliva Cisneros
Represented By: Joseph Michael Panvini
Represented By: Russell Snow Thompson, IV
Represented By: David Neal McDevitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?