Brittain et al v. Ducey et al
Plaintiff: Brittain For US Senate and Craig R Brittain
Defendant: Doug Ducey and Michele Reagan
Case Number: 2:2018cv02366
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Change of Judge, MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal/Cross-Appeal by Craig R Brittain. (DXD)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Motion for Reconsideration is denied and the Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Plaintiff shall have to and includingSeptember 11, 2018 in which to file an amended complaint as specified in the Court'sOrder (Doc. #7 ); meaning as to Counts one and two of the Complaint. Count three was dismissed without leave to amend. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 9/4/18. (EJA)
August 27, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re: #7 Order on Motion for Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint by Craig R Brittain. (GMP)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff Craig R. Brittain's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is granted. Plaintiff Brittain for US Senate must find representation by a licensed attorney within 30 days of the date of this Order. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) Count Three of the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as being frivolous and Counts One and Two are dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint no later than August 31, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss without prejudice and terminate this action on September 4, 2018, without further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs elect to file an amended complaint, the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/02/2018. (REK)
July 27, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS)
July 27, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
July 27, 2018 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02366-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Craig R Brittain. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Craig R Brittain. (BAS)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Craig R Brittain, Brittain For US Senate.(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brittain et al v. Ducey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittain For US Senate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig R Brittain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doug Ducey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michele Reagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?