Di Mauro v. Buca Incorporated
Plaintiff: Daniel Di Mauro
Defendant: Buca Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2018cv02540
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine
Referring Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the 30-day extension. The parties should be aware that the filing of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) will not postpone the time for compliance with the MIDP. General Order 17-08 provides that compliance may be deferred only for motions to dismiss based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, or absolute or qualified immunity of a public official. Defendant's time to respond to the complaint is extended to September 21, 2018. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/30/2018. (LMR)
August 29, 2018 Filing 11 STIPULATION re: #1 Complaint Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint by Buca Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uppal, Pavneet)
August 21, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE re: Notice of Service of Preliminary Order by Daniel Di Mauro . (Barrat, Jason)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRELIMINARY ORDER: Motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) must file proof of service of the summons and complaint or of waiver of service with the Clerk of Court no later than November 8, 2018. Plaintiff(s) shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on November 8, 2018, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/20/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Parties - Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project)(EJA)
August 16, 2018 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Steven P. Logan. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-2540-PHX-SPL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
August 15, 2018 Filing 7 *Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) *Modified on 8/16/2018 to correct file date (MAP)*.
August 10, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Buca Incorporated. (Barrat, Jason) (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
August 10, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO)
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15828938. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02540-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel Di Mauro. (Barrat, Jason)(MCO)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15828938 filed by Daniel Di Mauro. (Barrat, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Di Mauro v. Buca Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Di Mauro
Represented By: Jason Saul Barrat
Represented By: Michael David Zoldan
Represented By: Jessica Elizabeth Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buca Incorporated
Represented By: Pavneet Singh Uppal
Represented By: Alanna Rebecca Brook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?