Reish et al v. Mukai
| Louie Mukai |
| Robert Reish, Kathleen Reish and Ryuko Incorporated |
| Phoenix Heliparts Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv00400 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Bankruptcy: Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 *MOTION for Extension of Time Extension of Time to File Opening Brief to March 28, 2019 by Kathleen Reish, Robert Reish, Ryuko Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed order)(Horner, H) *Modified to remove ex-parte designation on 3/25/2019 (EJA). |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief. The deadline for Appellants to file their Opening Brief is extended from 2/27/2019 through and including 3/19/2019. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/28/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief -Unopposed filed by Robert Reish, Kathleen Reish, Ryuko Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv LRCiv 7.1(a)(1). No further action is required. Please do not refile. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LAD) |
| Filing 9 * MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief -Unopposed by Kathleen Reish, Robert Reish, Ryuko Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed order)(Horner, H) * Modified to remove ex parte designation; attorney noticed regarding Local Rule violation as to caption on 2/28/2019 (LAD). |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: The appellant shall serve and file an opening brief with the Clerk, United States District Court, within fourteen (14) days of the date this order is filed. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/11/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS. The Record on Appeal from the Bankruptcy Court is complete. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain the record. The filing of this Certificate constitutes the date of entry of the appeal on the docket in the District Court. (Bankruptcy Court - Phoenix, ) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kathleen Reish, Robert Reish, Ryuko Incorporated. (Horner, H) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Phoenix Heliparts Incorporated, Louie Mukai. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (EJA) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Louie Mukai, Phoenix Heliparts Incorporated. (Cross, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Phoenix Heliparts Incorporated, Ryuko Incorporated. (EJA) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal. (EJA) |
| Filing 1 Transmittal of Appeal/Bankruptcy Matter from Bankruptcy Court by Kathleen Reish, Robert Reish, Ryuko Incorporated. (EJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
