Panvini v. Select Home Warranty LLC
Plaintiff: Joseph Panvini
Defendant: Select Home Warranty LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv00907
Filed: February 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #12 MOTION to Withdraw #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay Motion for Leave to Withdraw Motion to Compel Arbitration and for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings filed by Select Home Warranty LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Shrem, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of John Koht)(Brackenridge, Dean)
April 5, 2019 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #12 MOTION to Withdraw #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay Motion for Leave to Withdraw Motion to Compel Arbitration and for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings filed by Joseph Panvini. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Emails between counsel, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Joseph Panvini)(Greenwald, Michael)
April 4, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE re: for Expedited Consideration by Select Home Warranty LLC re: #12 MOTION to Withdraw #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay Motion for Leave to Withdraw Motion to Compel Arbitration and for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings . (Carmody, Sheila)
April 4, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay Motion for Leave to Withdraw Motion to Compel Arbitration and for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings by Select Home Warranty LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Carmody, Sheila)
March 29, 2019 Remark: Pro Hac Vice Motions granted for Carly J. Tebelman and Dean R. Brackenridge on behalf of Defendant Select Home Warranty LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA)
March 27, 2019 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Select Home Warranty LLC. (Pugel, Rachael)
March 27, 2019 Filing 10 *MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Stay by Select Home Warranty LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1-3, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Pugel, Rachael). *Added MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Stay on 3/28/2019 (REK).
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Motion to Extend #8 is granted. Defendant's time to respond to the complaint is extended to March 27, 2019. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/11/2019. (LMR)
March 8, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Notice re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) by Select Home Warranty LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Carmody, Sheila)
February 14, 2019 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Joseph Panvini: Declaration of Service re: Complaint, Notice of Consent to Magistrate Judge, Preliminary Order and Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project upon Select Home Warranty LLC on 2/13/2019. (Greenwald, Michael)
February 13, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Michael Greenwald on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER: Plaintiff(s) must file proof of service of the summons and complaint or of waiver of service with the Clerk of Court no later than May 13, 2019. Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on May 13, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In accordance with the MIDP General Order, the parties must exchange MIDP Responses and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court no later than thirty (30) days after the first responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) is filed. Supplemental MIDP Responses shall be served on the opposing party no later than thirty (30) days after the information is discovered or revealed. The parties must produce to the opposing party the electronically stored information identified in the MIDP Responses no later than forty (40) days after the MIDP Responses have been served. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 MIDP Notice Documents) (REK)
February 12, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC)
February 12, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Select Home Warranty LLC. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 12, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16516779. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-907-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
February 12, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Joseph Panvini. (Greenwald, Michael) (DLC)
February 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16516779 filed by Joseph Panvini. (Greenwald, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Panvini v. Select Home Warranty LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Panvini
Represented By: Michael L Greenwald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Home Warranty LLC
Represented By: Dean R Brackenridge
Represented By: Rachael Marie Peters Pugel
Represented By: Carly J Tebelman
Represented By: Jesse D Wilson
Represented By: Sheila K Carmody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?