Ashcraft et al v. Pinal, County of et al
Dennis Ashcraft and Barbara Ashcraft |
Jeffrey McElwain, Pinal County Sheriff's Office, Zachary Wheeler, Unknown Parties, John Yoeman, Pinal, County of, Mark Lamb, Shawn Wilson, Roderick Harrison and Tanner Farnsworth |
2:2019cv02614 |
April 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants Mark Lamb, Pinal County Sheriff's Office, Pinal, County of. (Jellison, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Ashcraft, Dennis Ashcraft. (Rubin, Alexandra) |
Filing 8 ORDER approving the #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time. The parties have until 6/28/2019 to exchange their Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/29/19. (CLB) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Barbara Ashcraft, Dennis Ashcraft. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rubin, Alexandra) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 7/16/2019 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J. Humetewa. Joint Case Management Report due not less than seven (7) days before Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. [See attached Order for additional information.] Signed by Judge Diane J. Humetewa on 5/1/2019. (RMW) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mark Lamb, Pinal County Sheriff's Office, Pinal, County of.(Jellison, James) |
Filing 4 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/24/2019. (LFIG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16826425. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2614-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinal County Superior County, case number S1100CV201900034. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16826425 filed by Pinal County Sheriff's Office, Pinal, County of, Mark Lamb. (Jellison, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.