Ashworth v. Arizona, State of et al
Angela Ashworth |
Robin Coleman, Arizona, State of, Norman Twyford, Unknown Lebberman, Tiffany Miller, Unknown Abbot, Kim Currier, Elizabeth Oros, Unknown Hale, Unknown Kay, Richard Pratt, Henrietta Western, Christopher Papworth, Crystal Lee, Corizon Health Incorporated and Charles L Ryan |
2:2019cv02761 |
May 1, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
John Z Boyle |
Diane J Humetewa |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 First MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference Set for August 5, 2019 and Extend Deadline for Manadatory Initial Discovery Responses to Defendants Corizon Health, Inc. and Tiffany Miller by Angela Ashworth. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sloma, Melinda) |
![]() |
Filing 28 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corizon Health Incorporated. (Illsley, Alyssa) |
Filing 27 ANSWER to #24 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Corizon Health Incorporated, Tiffany Miller.(Illsley, Alyssa) |
Filing 26 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Angela Ashworth . (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Redline)(Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #24 Amended Complaint filed by Angela Ashworth. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 24 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Angela Ashworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits)(Sloma, Melinda) |
![]() |
Filing 22 Summons Issued as to Arizona, State of, c/o Attorney General, Mark Brnovich. (HLA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 21 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Angela Ashworth. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (KEP) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16852556 filed by Angela Ashworth. (Sloma, Melinda) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.