Cedeno v. IQ Data International Incorporated/Rent Collect Global
Plaintiff: David Cedeno
Defendant: IQ Data International Incorporated/Rent Collect Global
Case Number: 2:2019cv02916
Filed: May 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. #8 ), Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
June 19, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Cedeno. (Kent, Trinette)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff having filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. #6 ); IT IS ORDERED that this matter will be dismissed with prejudice within 60 days of the date of this Order unless a notice of dismissal is filed prior to the dismissal date. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/23/19. (MAW)
May 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by David Cedeno. (Kent, Trinette)
May 8, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to IQ Data International Incorporated/Rent Collect Global. (MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 8, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR)
May 8, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16884555. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2916-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR)
May 8, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by David Cedeno. (Kent, Trinette) (MFR)
May 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16884555 filed by David Cedeno. (Kent, Trinette) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedeno v. IQ Data International Incorporated/Rent Collect Global
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Cedeno
Represented By: Trinette G Kent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IQ Data International Incorporated/Rent Collect Global
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?