Serfas Incorporated et al v. JKL Innovation Incorporated
| Moon Sport Limited and Serfas Incorporated |
| JKL Innovation Incorporated and JKL Innovation Incorporated a New York corporation doing business as Blitzu |
| 2:2019cv03745 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Serfas Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Ted Luymes, Esq. for JKL Innovation, Inc. on July 8, 2019. (Shindler, Buzzi) |
Filing 13
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (Doc. #12 ) and extending Defendant's time to file an answer in response to the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) to August 23, 2019. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file proof of service of the Complaint and Summons within seven days of the date of this Order. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/19/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Moon Sport Limited, Serfas Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shindler, Buzzi) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Serfas Incorporated. (Shindler, Buzzi) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be dismissed without further notice after August 28, 2019, unless before then Plaintiff has properly served Defendant with the Summons and Complaint and has filed with the Clerk of the Court proof thereof pursuant to Rule 4(l) or has shown good cause for the failure to timely serve. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/31/19. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/31/19. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to JKL Innovation Incorporated. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to JKL Innovation Incorporated. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (Attachments: #1 AO 121)(DLC) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16972109. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-3745-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Serfas Incorporated and Moon Sport Limited. (Shindler, Buzzi) (DLC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Serfas Incorporated and Moon Sport Limited. (Shindler, Buzzi) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16972109 filed by Serfas Incorporated and Moon Sport Limited. (Shindler, Buzzi) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
