Goumas v. Freeman Law PLLC

Plaintiff: Avgi Goumas
Defendant: Freeman Law PLLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv04448
Filed: June 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 8/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/12/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
June 12, 2019 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT Supplemental Cover Sheet re: 4 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only) by Defendant Freeman Law PLLC. (Karr, Karen)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Freeman Law PLLC.(Karr, Karen)
June 12, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC)
June 12, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Freeman Law PLLC. Required document is not attached. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
June 12, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17034180. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4448-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
June 12, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Freeman Law PLLC. (Karr, Karen) (DLC)
June 12, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-003269. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17034180 filed by Freeman Law PLLC. (Karr, Karen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goumas v. Freeman Law PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freeman Law PLLC
Represented By: Karen L Karr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Avgi Goumas
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Faulkner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?