Smith v. New Mexico, State of et al
| Cheri Smith |
| New Mexico Department of Public Safety NCIC CJIS, Evangeline Echols, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Barbara Tedrow, New Mexico Eleventh Judicial District Attorney Office, New Mexico, State of, Denise Balderas, Kathy D Christesen, Hector Hugo Balderas, Jr, New Mexico Attorney General's Office, Judith Nakamura, Douglas A Echols, San Juan County Communications Agency, Brandie L Ferrari, Supreme Court of New Mexico, Robert Tedrow, Michael D Arnold, II, San Juan County Board of Commissioners, Regina Chacon, Stacey Arnold, Robert Shane Ferrari, San Juan County New Mexico Sheriff's Office, Kenneth W Christensen, Hector Hugo Balderas, Jr. and Kenneth W Christesen |
| 2:2019cv04641 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Eileen S Willett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cheri Smith. (81 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REK) |
| Summons Issued as to Kenneth W Christesen at counter to plaintiff. (BAS) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Michael D Arnold, II, Stacey Arnold, Denise Balderas, Hector Hugo Balderas, Jr, Regina Chacon, Kathy D Christesen, Douglas A Echols, Evangeline Echols, Brandie L Ferrari, Robert Shane Ferrari, New Mexico Attorney General's Office, New Mexico Department of Public Safety NCIC CJIS, New Mexico Eleventh Judicial District Attorney Office, New Mexico, State of, San Juan County Board of Commissioners, San Juan County Communications Agency, Supreme Court of New Mexico, Barbara Tedrow, Robert Tedrow. (SST) *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Doc. #4 . (See Order for further details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/7/2019. (SST)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SST) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Cheri Smith. (SST) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Cheri Smith. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SST) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX209868 filed by Cheri Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (SST) (Complaint and Exhibits: 79 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
