Declements v. HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated
Daniel Declements |
HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated |
2:2019cv04710 |
July 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
G Murray Snow |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
47:227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent HealthMarkets Group, Corporate Parent HealthMarkets Incorporated, Corporate Parent UnitedHealth Group Incorporated for HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated. (Bressler, Stephen) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated.(Bressler, Stephen) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Carolyn A DeLone, Adam K Levin on behalf of Defendant HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bressler, Stephen) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Stefan Coleman and Avi Kaufman on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Daniel Declements: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Kim Hightower at CT Corporation System on 07/17/2019. (Brown, Nathanael) |
Remark: Out of state attorneys notified of admission requirements; deadline to respond 08162019. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HealthMarkets Insurance Agency Incorporated. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17158734. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4710-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel Declements. (Brown, Nathanael) (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17158734 filed by Daniel Declements. (Brown, Nathanael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.