Encompass Insurance Company v. AMCO Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Encompass Insurance Company
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Laurence Sharlot and AMCO Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv05198
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 16 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Encompass Insurance Company. (Silverman, Stephen)
November 3, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Encompass Insurance Company. (Silverman, Stephen)
October 25, 2019 Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Encompass Insurance Company. (Silverman, Stephen)
October 25, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant AMCO Insurance Company. (Sharlot, Laurence)
October 18, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Encompass Insurance Company. (MMO)
September 26, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #10 Answer to Complaint filed by AMCO Insurance Company. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 5.5(g) - Documents signed by an attorney shall be filed using that attorney's ECF log-in and password and shall not be filed using a log-in and password belonging to another attorney. Document(s) signed by attorney Joseph Brody but submitted using the log-in and password belonging to attorney Laurence Sharlot. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA)
September 25, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by AMCO Insurance Company.(Sharlot, Laurence)
September 19, 2019 Filing 9 Joinder re: #1 Notice of Removal -- Response to Notice of Removal -- by Plaintiff Encompass Insurance Company. filed by Encompass Insurance Company. (Silverman, Stephen)
September 19, 2019 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Laurence Sharlot and John Doe Defendants Only, defendants Laurence Sharlot and Unknown Parties (named as John Does I-X, Jane Does I-X, black corporations I-XX, gray partnerships I-XX, blue limited partnerships I-XX) terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
September 19, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE re: of Voluntary Dismissal of Laurence Sharlot Only by Encompass Insurance Company . (Silverman, Stephen)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 11/22/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/18/2019. (MMO)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/18/2019. (MMO)
September 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO)
September 18, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17409652. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5198-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMCO Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for AMCO Insurance Company. (Brophy, Joseph) (MCO)
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019 008657. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17409652 filed by Laurence Sharlot, AMCO Insurance Company. (Brophy, Joseph) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit)(MCO)
September 18, 2019 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Notice of Service re: Summons/Complaint upon AMCO Insurance Company on 8/23/2019. (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Encompass Insurance Company v. AMCO Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Encompass Insurance Company
Represented By: Stephen E Silverman
Represented By: John Rollie Wightman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurence Sharlot
Represented By: Joseph Andrew Brophy
Represented By: Laurence Randall Sharlot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMCO Insurance Company
Represented By: Joseph Andrew Brophy
Represented By: Laurence Randall Sharlot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?