Brooke v. Phoenix FFIS LLC
| Theresa Brooke |
| Phoenix FFIS LLC and Phoenix FFIS LLC a Delaware limited liabiity company doing business as Fairfield Inn & Suites Phoenix Midtown |
| 2:2019cv05429 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendant Phoenix FFIS LLC. (DXD) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke against Defendant Phoenix FFIS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Strojnik, Peter) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Theresa Brooke: Affidavit of Process re: Complaint and Summons upon Defendant on October 21, 2019. (Strojnik, Peter) |
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on January 17, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/18/19. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/18/19. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Theresa Brooke. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Phoenix FFIS LLC. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17531242. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5429-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Theresa Brooke. (Strojnik, Peter) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17531242 filed by Theresa Brooke. (Strojnik, Peter) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
