Austin v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Plaintiff: Sally Austin
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2019cv05586
Filed: November 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Amended Complaint. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD)
December 23, 2019 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wright Medical Technology Incorporated filed by Sally Austin.(McGlamry, Michael)
December 13, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Michael Lee McGlamry and Joshua A Karr on behalf of Plaintiff Sally Austin. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 502, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 12/12/19. (MAW)
December 12, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Anne A Gruner on behalf of Defendant Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint and to Set a Deadline to Respond to the Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sally Austin shall file any amended complaint by December 23, 2019 and Wright Medical Technology, Inc's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is January 13, 2020. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 12/11/19. (MAW)
December 6, 2019 Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint Joint Motion for Leave for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint and to Set a Deadline to Respond to the Amended Complaint by Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Braddock, Cory)
December 2, 2019 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sally Austin: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet upon Wright Medical Technologies, Inc., c/o Corporation Service Company on 11/15/2019. (Ambrose, Scott)
November 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Sally Austin. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC)
November 8, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
November 8, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC)
November 7, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17612252. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-5586-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
November 7, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Sally Austin. (Ambrose, Scott) (ARC)
November 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17612252 filed by Sally Austin. (Ambrose, Scott) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Austin v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sally Austin
Represented By: Scott Adam Ambrose
Represented By: Michael Lee McGlamry
Represented By: Joshua A Karr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Represented By: Jacob Christensen Jones
Represented By: Anne A Gruner
Represented By: Cory L Braddock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?