Lopez v. State Farm Insurance Companies Group Health and Welfare Plan for United States Employees et al
Plaintiff: Ray M Lopez
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America and State Farm Insurance Companies Group Health and Welfare Plan for United States Employees
Case Number: 2:2020cv00180
Filed: January 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2020 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ray M Lopez: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 01/23/2020 to Life Insurance Company of North America . (Ronstadt, Erin)
February 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Ray M Lopez. Party State Farm Insurance Companies Group Health and Welfare Plan for United States Employees (an ERISA benefit plan) terminated. (Ronstadt, Erin)
February 3, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE re: Service of Preliminary Order by Ray M Lopez re: #3 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions, Set Deadlines . (Ronstadt, Erin)
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on April 22, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/29/2020. (LMR)
January 23, 2020 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17869397. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-180-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
January 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17869397 filed by Ray M Lopez. (Ronstadt, Erin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. State Farm Insurance Companies Group Health and Welfare Plan for United States Employees et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Insurance Companies Group Health and Welfare Plan for United States Employees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray M Lopez
Represented By: Erin Rose Ronstadt
Represented By: Clayton Warren Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?