Osornio v. Mayo Clinic
Plaintiff: Angel Osornio
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Case Number: 2:2020cv00199
Filed: January 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER - Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. #15 ) is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint no later than April 16, 2020. If Plaintiff elects to file a second amended complaint, the amended complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens it. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal if Plaintiffs fails to comply. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/18/20. (DXD)
March 17, 2020 Filing 15 REQUEST re: Settle Case Quickly by Plaintiff Angel Osornio. (DXD)
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #13 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/11/2020. (LMR)
March 10, 2020 Filing 13 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angel Osornio. (DXD)
February 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The #11 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the #1 Complaint is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order no later than March 30, 2020. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the amended complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens it pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint by March 30, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order of this Court. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/27/20. (GMP)
February 20, 2020 Filing 11 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angel Osornio. (DXD)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #8 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee associated with this action or file a renewed application no later than 3/2/20. The Clerk shall terminate this matter if Plaintiff fails to comply. Plaintiffs Motion for Fee Waiver (Doc. #9 ) and duplicative Application (Doc. #8 ) are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/13/20. (DXD)
February 7, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION for Fee Waiver by Angel Osornio. (GMP)
February 7, 2020 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angel Osornio. (GMP)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee associated with this action or file a renewed application by no later than 2/27/20. The Clerk shall terminate this case if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/29/20. (Attachments: #1 Application Form) (DXD)
January 28, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS)
January 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
January 28, 2020 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00199-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
January 28, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshals by Angel Osornio. (BAS)
January 28, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angel Osornio. (BAS)
January 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Angel Osornio.(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osornio v. Mayo Clinic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angel Osornio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?