Lepson #274649 v. Corizon Health Care et al
Robert M Lepson |
Centurion Healthcare, Linda Sewell, Scott Stewart, Unknown Weekly, J Todd, Chris Johnson, Corizon Health Care, Unknown Barrett, Joanne E Burns and Unknown Smith |
2:2020cv00208 |
January 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles (PS) |
Camille D Bibles |
Steven P Logan |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until April 17, 2020, to lodge a First Amended Complaint which is in compliance with Local Rule 15.1 (a). See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/26/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #9 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/26/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/26/2020. (MSA) |
Service Packet Forwarded to USMS. USM 285 Summons/notice/complaint/order, forwarded to USMS this date as to Corizon, Centurion, Sewell, and Burns. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Consider Documents (for Service) Filed on 3/17/2020 by Robert M Lepson. (LAD) (2 pages, entitled Notice that Plaintiff's Right of Access to the Courts is Being Denied) |
Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Robert M Lepson. (SST) (27 pages) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION in Support of #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert M Lepson. (SST) (2 pages) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert M Lepson. (SST) (4 pages) |
Filing 10 MOTION for the Appointment of Counsel by Robert M Lepson. (SST) (1 page) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Robert M Lepson. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/27/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #6 Order. (Attachments: #1 Samples and Blank Forms, #2 Defendant 2 forms, #3 Defendant 3 forms, #4 Defendant 4 forms)(MSA) |
Filing 6 ORDER - Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Count Four is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Todd, Stewart, Johnson, Weekly, Barrett, and Smith are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff this Order, and a copy of the Marshal's Process Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendants Corizon, Centurion, Sewell, and Burns. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/27/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 5 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing, please review attached document. (MSA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MSA) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robert M Lepson. (8 pages) (MSA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Robert M Lepson. (2 pages) (MSA) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Robert M Lepson. (21 pages) (MSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.