Waldrop v. IMR Services LLC et al
| Shannon Waldrop |
| Ian M Rowell, IMR Services LLC and Mathew Calica |
| 2:2020cv00243 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Shannon Waldrop. (Wood, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Shannon Waldrop. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Document also not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) The name, address, e-mail address, State Bar Attorney number, telephone number, and optionally the fax number, or the attorney appearing for the party in the action must be typewritten or printed in the space to the left of the center of the page and beginning at line one on the first page. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Shannon Waldrop. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file correct document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mathew Calica, IMR Services LLC and Ian M Rowell. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17908047. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-243-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Shannon Waldrop. (Wood, Jeffrey) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17908047 filed by Shannon Waldrop.(Wood, Jeffrey) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jeffrey D Wood on behalf of Plaintiff Shannon Waldrop. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
