Myers et al v. FCA US LLC et al
Mark Myers and Jenni Myers |
FCA US LLC, Joe Price, Arizona Fleet Services and Joe Price individually and a domestic corporation doing business as Price Car Company |
2:2020cv00337 |
February 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss, Opposition to Removal to Federal Jurisdiction, MOTION to Remand to State Court by Joe Price. (EJA) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re: #11 MOTION to Stay Briefing Schedule re: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response in Non Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Emergency Relief filed by FCA US LLC. (Busby, Curtis) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction subject to and without waiving their Motion to Remand, Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Jenni Myers, Mark Myers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FCA Corporate Overview, #2 Exhibit FCA Proving Grounds, #3 Text of Proposed Order proposed order on Defendants' motion to dismiss)(Counts, Andrew) *Modified linkage on 3/24/2020 (DXD). |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 MOTION to Stay Briefing Schedule re: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jenni Myers, Mark Myers. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 11 *Emergency MOTION to Stay Briefing Schedule re: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jenni Myers, Mark Myers. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Counts, Andrew) *Modified to correct motion type, text, and add document link on 3/17/2020 (REK). |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Jenni Myers, Mark Myers. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Jenni Myers, Mark Myers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Counts, Andrew) |
Remark: Out of state attorney E Todd Tracy removed for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Errata re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant FCA US LLC.. (Busby, Curtis) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Andrew Galen Counts on behalf of Plaintiffs Jenni Myers and Mark Myers. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by FCA US LLC. (Busby, Curtis) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (KEP) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17955810. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J. Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-337-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FCA US LLC. (Busby, Curtis) (KEP) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-000674. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17955810 filed by FCA US LLC. (Busby, Curtis) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit)(KEP) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** ANSWER to Complaint by Joe Price. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 2/3/2020) ***ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPORSES***(KEP) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration and Demand Jury Trial upon FCA US LLC on 1/14/2020. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 1/15/2020) and upon Joe Price on 1/13/2020 (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 1/15/2020). (KEP) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.