Hobbs v. Santiago et al
Plaintiff: Richard Paul Hobbs
Defendant: Michael Santiago and Mayo Clinic Hospital
Case Number: 2:2020cv00787
Filed: April 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2020 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Richard Paul Hobbs.(SLQ)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to the extent that Plaintiff must file his amended complaint by 6/1/2020. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 5/11/2020. (RMW)
May 1, 2020 Filing 9 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Richard Paul Hobbs. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ)
May 1, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint by Richard Paul Hobbs. (SLQ) (1 page).
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 *ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ); however, the Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons unless and until Plaintiff complies with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint (Doc. #1 ) is stricken. Plaintiff has 21 days to file a typewritten amended complaint after which the Court will undertake to screen the amended complaint as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint as required by this Order within 21 days, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing this case, without prejudice. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/27/20. (SLQ) *Modified to regenerate NEF on 5/4/2020 (SCH).
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 *STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER - IT IS ORDERED, if not already accomplished prior to the date of this Order, that Plaintiff(s) shall effect service of the Complaint and Summons upon all Defendants no later than 90 days after the filing of the Complaint. This shall serve as notice to the Plaintiff under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the Court shall dismiss this action without further notice to the Plaintiff with respect to any Defendant named in the Complaint that is not served in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within that 90-day period. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/23/20. (SLQ) *Modified to regenerate NEF on 5/4/2020 (SCH).
April 23, 2020 Filing 5 *NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SLQ) *Modified to regenerate NEF on 5/4/2020 (SCH).
April 23, 2020 Filing 4 *NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SLQ) *Modified to regenerate NEF on 5/4/2020 (SCH).
April 21, 2020 Filing 3 *This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A. Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-00787-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SLQ) *Modified text on 4/23/2020 (SLQ).
April 21, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Paul Hobbs. (SLQ) (5 pages).
April 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Paul Hobbs.(SLQ) (16 pages).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hobbs v. Santiago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Paul Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?