Reeves v. Reed
Plaintiff: Arvel Derek Reeves
Defendant: Kenneth W Reed
Case Number: 2:2020cv00972
Filed: May 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2020 Filing 10 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Arvel Derek Reeves: Affidavit of Service re: summons/complaint/civil cover sheet upon Kenneth Reed on 5/23/20. (Yetnikoff, Isidore) *Modified to correct event on 7/17/2020 (GMP).
July 16, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Kenneth W Reed. (Collins, Peter)
June 1, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE re: NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURT ORDER UPON DEFENDANT by Arvel Derek Reeves re: #7 Order, Set Deadlines . (Yetnikoff, Isidore)
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant (s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on August 18, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/29/20. (MAW)
May 27, 2020 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kenneth W Reed filed by Arvel Derek Reeves.(Yetnikoff, Isidore)
May 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that within two weeks of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint properly alleging the citizenship of each party. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/27/20. (MAW)
May 19, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kenneth W Reed. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 19, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18296541. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-972-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
May 19, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Arvel Derek Reeves.. (Yetnikoff, Isidore) (MCO)
May 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18296541 filed by Arvel Derek Reeves. (Yetnikoff, Isidore) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reeves v. Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth W Reed
Represented By: Peter Collins, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arvel Derek Reeves
Represented By: Isidore Yetnikoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?