Begay #165528 v. Shinn et al
| Leo Begay |
| David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2020cv01083 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17 ) is ADOPTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner's "Motion for: exhaustion of state remedies. exhaus tion of the legal bases of the claim. exhaustion of the factual bases of the claim." (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner's motion to amend the petition for habeas corpus (Doc. 16 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a C ertificate of Appealability is DENIED because dismissal of the petition is justified by a procedural bar and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Jurists of reason would not find the proced ural or constitutional rulings debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Court shall enter judgement in favor of the Respondent. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 10/27/21. (SST)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
